- Why data protection law is uniquely equipped to let us fight a pandemic with personal data
- A US Bill from 1974 shares so much DNA with the GDPR, it could be its ancestor
- Planet49 CJEU Judgment brings some ‘Cookie Consent’ Certainty to Planet Online Tracking
- The CJEU decides lack of access to personal data does not unmake a joint controller: A look at Wirtschaftsakademie
- Brief case-law companion for the GDPR professional
- Exam scripts are partly personal data and other practical findings of the CJEU in Nowak
- A Conversation with Giovanni Buttarelli about The Future of Data Protection: setting the stage for an EU Digital Regulator
- Why did Facebook just receive (one of) the biggest data protection fine(s) on record
- Exam scripts and examiner’s corrections are personal data of the exam candidate (AG Kokott Opinion in Nowak)
- Highlights of the draft LIBE report on the ePrivacy Reg
Tags rouletteAG Mengozzi Article 8 Charter article 29 working party big data CJEU cloud computing CNIL data portability data protection Data Protection Directive data protection laws data protection officer data protection reform data protection regulation directive 95/46 directive 95/46/EC EDPS European Commission European Data Protection Supervisor European Parliament Facebook Gabriela Zanfir GDPR Google personal data PNR privacy right to be forgotten Surveillance technology Viviane Reding
14 years ago. The “Get over it!” famous remark
Rebuild the wall.
I debated with… myself during the past days how should I begin the “General Conclusions” section of my thesis and I finally decided that I should start it with McNealy’s famous words:
“You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it!”
In an effort to provide a proper source for this quotation, I searched for it and realized that McNealy said this 14 years ago. Wow! Here is the source I will most probably cite: http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/1999/01/17538.
14 years have passed and I wonder, taking into account that in 1999 we had zero privacy, whether now we’re having -100. Or -1000. We’re on the “minus” side anyway.
The question is “should we really get over it?”. I think not. In fact, this is how I will continue the remarks in my general conclusion of the thesis: we should not get over it. We should be aware of our rights and we should claim them so that we should rebuild opacity walls around us. Of course, if we want to.
Leave a comment
Posted in Comments
Tagged general conclusions, get over it, McNealy, privacy, rights, you have zero privacy