OECD published this week the revised version of the 1980 privacy Guidelines.
According to the OECD website, “two themes run through the updated Guidelines. First is a focus on the practical implementation of privacy protection through an approach grounded in risk management. Second is the need for greater efforts to address the global dimension of privacy through improved interoperability. A number of new concepts are introduced, including:
- National privacy strategies. While effective laws are essential, the strategic importance of privacy today also requires a multifaceted national strategy co-ordinated at the highest levels of government.
- Privacy management programmes. These serve as the core operational mechanism through which organisations implement privacy protection.
- Data security breach notification. This provision covers both notice to an authority and notice to an individual affected by a security breach affecting personal data.
Other revisions modernise the OECD approach to transborder data flows, detail the key elements of what it means to be an accountable organisation, and strengthen privacy enforcement. As a step in a continuing process, this revision leaves intact the original “Basic Principles” of the Guidelines. On-going work by the OECD on privacy protection in a data-driven economy will provide further opportunities to ensure that its privacy framework is well adapted to current challenges.”
Should we say hello to the provisioned new global data protection law? I think so.
What Happens in the Cloud Stays in the Cloud, or Why the Cloud’s Architecture Should Be Transformed in ‘Virtual Territorial Scope’
This is the paper I presented at the Harvard Institute for Global Law and Policy 5th Conference, on June 3-4, 2013. I decided to make it available open access on SSRN. I hope you will enjoy it and I will be very pleased if any of the readers would provide comments and ideas. The main argument of the paper is that we need global solutions for regulating cloud computing. It begins with a theoretical overview on global governance, internet governance and territorial scope of laws, and it ends with three probable solutions for global rules envisaging the cloud. Among them, I propose the creation of a “Lex Nubia” (those of you who know Latin will know why 😉 ). My main concern, of course, is related to privacy and data protection in the cloud, but that is not the sole concern I deal with in the paper.
Abstract:
You can download the full text of the paper following this link: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2409006
Share this:
Like this:
Leave a comment
Posted in Academic Resource, Comments, DP Fundamentals, Europe, News, US and Canada, World
Tagged cloud computing regulation, convention 108 and cloud computing, data protection in cloud computing, Gabriela Zanfir, lex nubia, privacy in the cloud, virtual territorial scope, what happens in the cloud stays in the cloud, WTO and cloud computing, zanfir cloud computing